E. Abrahamson, H. Berkowitz, and H. Dumez, A more relevant approach to relevance in Management Studies: an essay on performativity, vol.41, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01380367

F. Aggeri, Qu'est-ce que la performativité peut apporter aux recherches en management et sur les organisations, M@ n@ gement, vol.20, issue.1, pp.28-69, 2017.

C. Alario-hoyos, M. Pérez-sanagustín, C. Delgado-kloos, and M. Muñoz-organero,

A. Rodríguez-de-las-heras, Analysing the impact of built-in and external social tools in a MOOC on educational technologies, European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, pp.5-18, 2013.

F. Allard-poesi, cours d'épistémologie à l'intention des doctorants ESCP Europe, 2016.

T. Anderson and R. Mcgreal, Disruptive pedagogies and technologies in universities, Advanced Learning Technologies, vol.15, pp.380-389, 2012.

C. Argyris and D. A. Schön, Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice MA, 1996.

A. Asuncion, J. De-haan, M. Mohri, K. Patel, A. Rostamizadeh et al., , 2014.

, Communication présentée à la première ACM Conference on Learning@ scale conference

G. Atlanta and U. ,

R. C. Atkinson and R. M. Shiffrin, Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes, 1968.

J. L. Austin, How to Do Things with Words, 1962.

J. Bacher, K. Wenzig, and M. Vogler, SPSS TwoStep Cluster-a first evaluation, 2004.

A. Bandura, Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change, Psychological review, vol.84, issue.2, 1977.

K. Barad, Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter, Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, vol.28, issue.3, pp.801-831, 2003.

K. Barad, Meeting the universe halfway : Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning, 2007.

M. Beaud, L'art de la thèse, 2003.

M. V. Beaulieu-prévost, A. Ouellette, and M. Achille, Analyse de classification hiérarchique et qualité de vie, Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, vol.1, issue.1, pp.25-30, 2005.

F. Bell, Network theories for technology-enabled learning and social change: Connectivism and actor network theory, Networked learning conference 2010: Seventh international conference on networked learning, 2010.

P. M. Bentler and D. G. Weeks, Linear structural equations with latent variables, 1980.

, Psychometrika, vol.45, issue.3, pp.289-308

R. K. Blashfield and M. S. Aldenderfer, The methods and problems of cluster analysis, 1988.

, Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology, pp.447-473

C. Boudry and C. Agostini, Étude comparative des fonctionnalités des moteurs de recherche d'images sur Internet. Documentaliste-Sciences de l'information, vol.41, pp.96-105, 2004.

A. Bozkurt, N. O. Keskin, I. ;. De-waard, and D. Dufour, Research trends in massive open online course (MOOC) theses and dissertations: Surfing the tsunami wave, Open Praxis, vol.8, issue.3, p.221, 2003.

T. A. Brown, Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, 2015.

J. Bruner, Gender trouble, feminist theory, and psychoanalytic discourse, J, p.327, 1966.

J. Butler, Ce qui fait une vie. Essai sur la violence, la guerre et le deuil, Lectures, Les rééditions, 2010.

M. Callon, Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The sociological review, vol.32, pp.196-233, 1984.

M. Callon, An essay on framing and overflowing: economic externalities revisited by sociology, The Sociological Review, vol.46, issue.1_suppl, pp.244-269, 1998.

M. Callon, What does it mean to say that economics is performative, Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, 2007.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00091596

M. Callon and F. Muniesa, Peripheral vision: Economic markets as calculative collective devices, Organization studies, vol.26, issue.8, pp.1229-1250, 2005.

P. C. Candy, Self-Direction for Lifelong Learning. A Comprehensive Guide to Theory and Practice, pp.94104-1310, 1991.

P. Carré, Les apprentissages professionnels informels. Editions L'Harmattan, 2003.

P. Carré, L'apprenance. Vers un nouveau rapport au savoir, 2005.

P. Carré and P. Caspar, Traité des sciences et des techniques de la formation, Collection: Psycho Sup, 2011.

M. Carricano, F. Poujol, and L. Bertrandias, Analyse de données avec SPSS®, 2010.

J. F. Céci, Les technologies peuvent-elles modifier la forme universitaire?, 2018.

!. Certainement, Distances et médiations des savoirs, Distance and Mediation of Knowledge, issue.22

J. F. Céci, Pourquoi le numérique éducatif fait-il tant débat autour des bénéfices que l'on peut en attendre ? Explications via la métaphore de l'amplificateur pédagogique et définition de la pédagogie à l'ère du numérique. ffhal-01856228f sur, 2018.

B. Charlier, Les MOOC: une innovation à analyser. Distances et médiations des savoirs, Distance and Mediation of Knowledge, vol.2, issue.5, 2014.

B. Charlier and D. Peraya, Comment combiner enseignement présenciel et à distance, 2013.

D. Publié-dans, &. Berthiaume, and . Colet, La pédagogie de l'enseignement supérieur : repères théoriques et applications pratiques. Tome 1 : Enseigner au supérieur, pp.211-222, 2013.

B. Charlier, N. Deschryver, and D. Peraya, Apprendre en présence et à distance, Distances et savoirs, vol.4, issue.4, pp.469-496, 2006.

P. C. Cheng, Unlocking conceptual learning in mathematics and science with effective representational systems, Computers and Education, vol.33, issue.2, pp.109-130, 1999.

A. Chiappe-laverde, N. Hine, and J. A. Martínez-silva, Literatura y práctica: una revisión crítica acerca de los MOOC= Literature and Practice: A Critical Review of MOOCs, 2015.

, Comunicar, vol.22, issue.44, pp.9-18

C. M. Christensen, The innovator's dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail, 2013.

C. M. Christensen, M. B. Horn, and H. Staker, Is K-12 Blended Learning Disruptive? An Introduction to the Theory of Hybrids. Clayton Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation, 2013.

C. M. Christensen, M. B. Horn, L. Caldera, and L. Soares, Disrupting College: How Disruptive Innovation Can Deliver Quality and Affordability to Postsecondary Education, 2011.

M. Clarà and E. Et-barberà, Learning online : massive open online courses (MOOCs), connectivism, and cultural psychology, Distance Education, vol.34, issue.1, pp.129-136, 2013.

G. Conole, A new classification schema for MOOCs. The international journal for Innovation and Quality in Learning, vol.2, pp.65-77, 2014.

F. Cooren, Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings, Organization, vol.11, issue.3, pp.373-393, 2004.

M. J. Cox, Formal to informal learning with IT : research challenges and issues for elearning, Journal of computer assisted learning, vol.29, issue.1, pp.85-105, 2013.

J. Daniel, Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility, Journal of interactive Media in education, issue.3, p.2012, 2012.

F. X. De-vaujany, Sociomatérialité et information dans les organisations: entre bonheur et sens. Presses de l'Université Laval, 2015.

E. De-vries, Les logiciels d'apprentissage: panoplie ou éventail, Revue française de pédagogie, pp.105-116, 2001.

E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior, Psychological inquiry, vol.11, issue.4, 2000.

C. Dejoux and V. Et-charrière-grillon, How digital technologies are revolutionising the training function in companies : an exploratory study of a population of managers attending a MOOC, Revue de gestion des ressources humaines, pp.42-58, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02103581

C. Dejoux and F. Cascioli, L'interaction entre un dispositif d'apprentissage numérique et les représentations de l'apprenant. Le cas du MOOC «du manager au leader agile» au sein de la Safran University. Distances et médiations des savoirs, Distance and Mediation of Knowledge, issue.24, 2018.

R. Deng, P. Benckendorff, and D. Gannaway, Progress and new directions for teaching and learning in MOOCs, Computers & Education, vol.129, pp.48-60, 2019.

J. Denis, Études de communication. Langages, information, médiations, pp.8-24, 2006.

J. Desjardins, L'analyse de régression logistique, Tutorial in quantitative methods for psychology, vol.1, pp.35-41, 2005.

J. Dewey, How we think. Boston: D. C. Heath and Company, 1909.

J. Dewey, Experience and education, The Educational Forum, vol.50, pp.241-252, 1986.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00692056

J. Dewey, Logic: The Theory of Inquiry, 1938.

S. Downes, Feature: E-learning 2.0. Elearn magazine, p.1, 2005.

S. Downes, Learning networks and connective knowledge. Collective intelligence and elearning, p.20, 2006.

S. Downes, Models for sustainable open educational resources, Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, vol.3, 2007.

M. Egloffstein, Massive Open Online Courses in Digital Workplace Learning, Digital Workplace Learning, pp.149-166, 2018.

Y. Engeström, Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research, 1987.

F. Eustache and B. Desgranges, Actor-network theory in education, 2010.

A. Field, Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. sage, 2013.

A. Freitas and J. Paredes, Understanding the faculty perspectives influencing their innovative practices in MOOCs/SPOCs: a case study, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol.15, issue.1, p.5, 2018.

C. Friedl, T. Staubitz, and D. Jansen, Flexible, Self-Directed and Bottom-Up: Are Employees Overtaking Their Human Resource Departments with MOOCs, 2018 learning with MOOCS (LWMOOCS), pp.66-69, 2018.

R. M. Gagné and R. M. Gagné, Conditions of learning and theory of instruction, 1985.

J. M. Gallina, Les représentations: un enjeu pour les sciences cognitives. Peut-on se passer de représentations en sciences cognitives, pp.13-31, 2011.

D. R. Garrison and T. Anderson, e-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice, 2003.

D. Ga?evi?, V. Kovanovi?, S. Joksimovi?, and G. Siemens, Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC Research Initiative, International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol.15, issue.5, pp.134-176, 2014.

J. P. Gond, L. Cabantous, N. Harding, and M. Learmonth, What do we mean by performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of performativity, International Journal of Management Reviews, vol.18, issue.4, pp.440-463, 2016.

B. E. Guajardo-leal, C. Navarro-corona, and J. R. Valenzuela-gonzález, Systematic Mapping Study of Academic Engagement in MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, p.20, 2019.

G. Guelfand, Les études qualitatives: fondamentaux, méthodes, analyse, techniques, Éditions EMS, 2013.

S. Haggard, B. H. Wang, and X. L. He, The MOOC Is Maturing, J]. Educational Research, vol.5, issue.412, pp.92-112, 2014.

J. Heutte, J. Kaplan, F. Fenouillet, P. A. Caron, and M. Rosselle, MOOC user persistence, International Workshop on Learning Technology for Education in Cloud, pp.13-24, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01948551

J. Hill and J. Foster, , p.388, 2010.

I. Hilton, J. L. Gaudet, D. Clark, P. Robinson, J. Wiley et al., The adoption of open educational resources by one community college math department. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, p.14, 2013.

P. R. Hinton, I. Mcmurray, and C. Brownlow, , 2014.

D. Hooper, J. Coughlan, and M. R. Mullen, Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit, Electronic journal of business research methods, vol.6, issue.1, pp.53-60, 2008.

E. Hutchins, Cognition in the Wild, 1995.

D. Iacobucci, Structural equations modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics, Journal of consumer psychology, vol.20, issue.1, pp.90-98, 2010.

J. Jacoby, The disruptive potential of the Massive Open Online Course: A literature review, Flexible & Distance Learning, vol.18, p.73, 2014.

A. Jézégou, Apprentissage autodirigé et formation à distance, Distances et savoirs, vol.6, issue.3, pp.343-364, 2008.

A. Jézégou, Créer de la présence à distance en e-learning. Distances et savoirs, vol.8, pp.257-274, 2010.

D. Jodelet, Représentation sociale: phénomènes, concept et théorie. Psychologie sociale, vol.2, pp.357-378, 1984.

S. Karnouskos, Massive open online courses (MOOCs) as an enabler for competent employees and innovation in industry, Computers in Industry, vol.91, pp.1-10, 2017.

J. Kennedy, Characteristics of massive open online courses (MOOCs): A research review, Journal of Interactive Online Learning, vol.13, p.1, 2009.

D. A. Kenny, , 2015.

M. Knowles, Theories of learning based on studies of adults The Adult Learner: a neglected species, pp.45-49, 1973.

M. S. Knowles, J. Knox, S. Bayne, H. Macleod, J. Ross et al., The modern practice of adult education, CAMBRIDGE Adult Education, p.1, 1970.

A. Y. Kolb and D. Kolb, The Kolb learning style inventory version 3.1 2005 technical specifications, 2005.

D. Kolb, Experential learning. Experience as the source of learning and development, 1984.

R. Kop, The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol.12, pp.19-38, 2011.

K. Kuutti, Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction, p.1744, 1996.

A. Lamoureux and A. Lamoureux, Recherche et méthodologie en sciences humaines, 2006.

B. Latour, Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society, 1987.

B. Latour, Reassembling the social : An introduction to actor-network-theory, 1993.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02057191

D. Laurillard, Multimedia and the learner's experience of narrative. Computers and education, vol.31, pp.229-242, 1998.

D. Laurillard, Rethinking University Education : A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies, 2002.

D. Laurillard, Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology, 2013.

J. Law and V. Singleton, Object lessons, Organization, vol.12, issue.3, pp.331-355, 2005.

L. Boterf and G. , Construire les compétences individuelles et collectives, Eyrolles, 2004.

P. M. Leonardi, When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies, MIS quarterly, pp.147-167, 2011.

K. Lewin, Frontiers in Group Dynamics: Concept, Method and Reality in Social Science; Social Equilibria and Social Change, Human Relations, 1947.

T. R. Liyanagunawardena, A. A. Adams, and S. A. Williams, MOOCs : A systematic study of the published literature, International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol.14, issue.3, pp.202-227, 2008.

H. Lune and B. L. Berg, Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, 2016.

J. F. Lyotard, La condition postmoderne, The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge, vol.10, 1979.

R. C. Maccallum, M. W. Browne, and H. M. Sugawara, Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling, Psychological methods, vol.1, issue.2, 1996.

S. Mak, R. Williams, and J. Mackness, Blogs and forums as communication and learning tools in a MOOC, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning, pp.275-285, 2010.

A. Mcauley, B. Stewart, G. Siemens, and D. Cormier, The MOOC model for digital practice, 2010.

H. Mellar, Learning Within Artificial Worlds : Computer Based Modelling In The Curriculum, 2013.

S. Moscovici, La psychanalyse, son image et son public, 1961.

F. Muniesa, The provoked economy: Economic reality and the performative turn, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00989576

B. A. Nardi, Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction, 1996.

M. J. Norusis, Upper Saddlr River, SPSS 16.0 guide to data analysis, 2008.

L. Olivier, G. Bédard, and J. Ferron, L'élaboration d'une problématique de recherche: sources, outils et méthode. Editions L'Harmattan, 2005.

W. J. Orlikowski, Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization studies, vol.28, pp.1435-1448, 2007.

W. J. Orlikowski and S. V. Scott, What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector, Organization Science, vol.25, issue.3, pp.868-891, 2013.

G. Ortoleva, C. Peltier, and M. Betrancourt, Pour une caractérisation systématique des MOOC orientée ingénierie pédagogique. Revue des sciences et techniques de l'information et de la communication pour l'éducation et la formation, p.24, 2017.

E. Pantò and A. Comas-quinn, The challenge of open education, Journal of E-learning and Knowledge Society, vol.9, issue.1, pp.11-22, 2013.

I. P. Pavlov, Technologies, innovation et niveaux de changement: les technologies peuvent-elles modifier la forme universitaire, Distances et médiations des savoirs, 1927.

D. Peraya and J. Meunier, Sémiotique et cognition : voyage autour de quelques concepts, vol.16, pp.16-27, 1998.

D. Peraya, C. Peltier, E. Villiot-leclercq, M. Nagels, C. Morin et al., Typologie des dispositifs de formation hybrides: configurations et métaphores, 2012.

V. Perret and M. Séville, Fondements épistémologiques de la recherche. Méthodes de recherche en management, pp.13-33, 2003.

J. Piaget, B. Inhelder, and A. Pickering, The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science, 1966.

J. Piaget, L'équilibration des structures cognitives: problème central du développement. Presses universitaires de France, 1975.

P. Rabardel, Les hommes et les technologies; approche cognitive des instruments contemporains sur ffhal-01017462f, 1995.

P. Rabardel, Qu'est-ce qu'un instrument. Les dossiers de l'Ingénierie éducative, vol.19, pp.61-65, 1995.

P. Rabardel, Le langage comme instrument? Éléments pour une théorie instrumentale élargie. Avec Vygotski, pp.241-265, 1999.

K. R. Rafiq, H. Hashim, and M. M. Yunus, MOOC for Training: How Far It Benefits Employees?, Client-Centered Therapy: Its Current Practice, Implications and Theory, vol.1424, p.12033, 1951.

C. Rogers, Freedom to Learn: A View of What Education Might Become, 1969.

H. J. Rubin and I. S. Rubin, Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data, 2011.

H. ;. Sakonidis, H. Mellar, J. Bliss, R. Boohan, J. Ogborn et al., Representations and representation systems, Learning with artificial worlds, pp.39-45, 1994.

J. C. Sallaberry, Dynamique des représentations dans la formation, 1996.

A. Sangrà, M. González-sanmamed, and T. Anderson, Metaanálisis de la investigación sobre MOOC en el período 2013-2014. Educación XXI: revista de la Facultad de Educación, vol.18, pp.21-49, 2015.

D. Schön, The Reflective Practitioner: How professionals think in action, 1983.

D. Schön, Educating the Reflective Practitioner, 1987.

. Seville and V. Perret, Les critères de validité en sciences des organisations: les apports du pragmatisme, 2002.

D. Shah, A product at every price: A review of MOOC stats and trends in 2017, Class Central. Récupéré sur, 2018.

G. Siemens, Connectivism: Learning as network-creation, ASTD Learning News, issue.1, p.10, 2005.

G. Siemens, Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age, International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning (ITDL), 2014.

J. H. Steiger, Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach, Multivariate behavioral research, vol.25, issue.2, pp.173-180, 1990.

R. A. Thiétart, Méthodes de recherche en management-4ème édition, 2014.

E. L. Thorndike, Un point sur l'ergonomie des interfaces hypermédias, Le travail humain, vol.58, issue.1, pp.17-45, 1905.

A. Tricot, Un point sur l'ergonomie des interfaces hypermédias, Le travail humain, vol.58, issue.1, pp.17-45, 1995.

F. Varela, Autonomie et connaissance. Essai sur le vivant, éditions du Seuil, collection la couleur des idées. Principles of biological autonomy, 1979.

F. J. Varela and P. Shepherdson, Invitation aux sciences cognitives. Seuil, Collection : Points Sciences Veletsianos, International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol.16, issue.3, pp.1-17, 1989.

G. Veletsianos and P. Shepherdson, A systematic analysis and synthesis of the empirical MOOC literature published in 2013-2015, International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol.17, pp.198-221, 2016.

R. Vienneau, Apprentissage et enseignement: Théories et pratiques, 2011.

L. S. Vygotski, Pensée et langage. La Dispute, 1934.

M. Warschauer, Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, vol.106, pp.147-166, 2007.

J. B. Watson, The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative science quarterly, Psychological review, vol.20, issue.2, pp.628-652, 1913.

M. Zhu, A. Sari, and C. Bonk, A systematic review of MOOC research methods and topics: Comparing, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, pp.1673-1682, 2014.

B. J. Zimmerman, Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice, vol.41, pp.64-70, 2002.

, H6 : les apprenants perçoivent le MOOCLead comme un outil amplificateur de l

, H7 : Le MOOCLead présente un niveau d'hybridation élevé au sein de l'offre de formation de l'entreprise, p.7, 2018.

, Les variables correspondent donc chacune à un niveau d'hybridation